Presented by Thomas Gorczynski Partner/CEO/President Gorczynski & Associates, LLC
One of my favorite presenters — Tom Gorczynski — is giving a free webinar in conjunction with RCReports (one of my favorite apps), and CPA Academy (one of my favorite education platforms) this Thursday, January 12 (to repeat on Thursday, February 2), on Section 199A and how it interacts with Reasonable Compensation requirements.
The course description from CPA Academy:
§199A is a key tax deduction available to pass-through entities through tax year 2025. Reasonable compensation determinations have a substantial impact on a taxpayer’s potential §199A deduction and are an important part of tax planning. This course will describe how reasonable compensation intersects with §199A and tax planning with examples.
Learning Objectives
Name factors impacting S corporation’s reasonable compensation determinations
Describe the effects on §199A of paying less than the reasonable compensation amount
Identify the effects on §199A of paying more than the reasonable compensation amount
Thomas A. Gorczynski, EA, USTCP is a nationally recognized speaker and educator on federal tax law matters. He is editor-in-chief of EA Journal, author of the Tom Talks Taxes newsletter, co-author of the PassKey Learning Systems EA Review Series, and co-owner of Compass Tax Educators.
It’s an extremely important topic, and one of the best presenters out there — and it’s free! (No, I’m not being paid to promote this; I simply want to make sure my readers don’t miss out on a golden opportunity.) If you struggle with entity choice calculations due to Section 199A, or if you are unsure how to calculate Reasonable Compensation, you should take this opportunity to learn more.
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
Chicago businesses should take a moment to review upcoming changes before year-end.
The Chicago Department of Business Affairs & Consumer Protection (BACP) was designed to “license businesses and public vehicles, provide business education and access to resources, enforce the Municipal Code, and protect consumers from fraud,” which means that sometimes they have to create and enforce ordinances and regulations that are a bit arduous or challenging for small businesses. But in the public interest, we need to take a moment to review the annual changes and requirements to make sure we have everything in order. (Besides, the penalties for willful ignorance are no fun.)
With that in mind, here are some things you’ll need to make sure to take care of before ringing in the new year.
Illinois Department of Human Rights Sexual Harassment Training For the record, this one is state-mandated, not just city-wide. The Illinois Workplace Transparency Act requires all employers to comply with the sexual harassment prevention training by December 31, 2020, and thereafter must provide annual training to all employees. As of July 1, 2020, the Illinois Human Rights Act defines “employers” as those having one or more employees (replacing the prior threshold of 15 or more employees in Illinois for most types of discrimination). This means that every employer in Illinois must comply with this sexual harassment training requirement, for all employees working in Illinois, regardless of their status as part-time, intern, or temporary. There is no requirement to train independent contractors, though it is recommended.
Chicago Minimum Wage Back in 2014, the city implemented a gradual increase of the minimum wage. It applies to any employee who works at least two hours in any two-week period. As of July 1, 2022 the minimum wage in Chicago is $14.50 per hour for employers with 4 to 20 workers, and $15.40 per hour for employers with 21 or more workers. Tipped workers have a minimum wage of $8.70 for employers with 4 to 20 workers, and $9.24 for employers with 21 or more workers. If a tipped worker’s wages plus tips do not equal at least the full minimum wage, the employer must make up the difference. BACP offers a one-hour-long free webinar on the ordinance.
Chicago Paid Sick Leave This ordinance went into effect on July 1, 2017, and was so poorly-written that folks are still confused. It applies to any business or individual that employs at least one “employee” and has a facility within Chicago’s city limits (though Cook County followed suit a few months later and has a similar requirement). The term “employee” covers anyone who works at least 80 hours within a 120-day period (20 hours a month). – For hourly employees, paid sick leave accrues at one-hour for every 40 hours worked. Salaried-exempt employees are presumed to have worked 40 hours/week. – Employees are capped at accruing a total of 40 hours of sick leave each year, unless the employer opts to set a higher limit. – Employers must permit employees to carry over half of their accrued leave, to a maximum of 20 hours of unused sick leave each year (40 for employers with 50 or more employees). – Employers are not required to pay out any accrued but unused sick leave upon employment termination.
Illinois Secure Choice Retirement Savings Plan State law now requires every Illinois employer with 16 or more employees to either offer their own retirement program, or to sign up to help staff contribute to personal IRAs via Secure Choice. As of November 1, 2023, this obligation will extend to employers with 5 or more employees.
Aside from the administrative burden, there are no costs to small businesses owners. The program facilitates saving for retirement — but is still limited to the IRS’s annual $6000 cap ($1k higher for those 50 and up), increasing to $6,500 in 2023. (For those interested in a higher limit, I strongly recommend Guideline 401k plans for small businesses, which use low-cost Vanguard Admiral Shares — my own clients have the first five months of plan fees waived.)
(I’ll be providing a breakdown and analysis of the plan and the info-session in an upcoming blog post. Spoiler alert: I’m mostly pretty happy with this legislation! –This doesn’t happen often.– However, most sole proprietors will want to make sure to implement their own savings plan simultaneously, since they won’t be eligible to participate; and many others will prefer the 401k approach due to higher limits.)
State Unemployment Insurance Contribution Determination Rate If you have employees, you should normally have received a letter from IDES with your 2023 unemployment rate determination by now, but they are running behind and the letters won’t be posted on mytax.illinois.gov until January 5th, 2023. As soon as they do, you will need to update your payroll company’s records with the new unemployment tax rate, or it can cause expensive problems with reporting and reconciliations in the future. I wrote a blog on how to do this if you’re using Gusto for payroll.
HAPPY NEW YEAR, CHICAGO SMALL BUSINESSES: WE WOULDN’T BE A WORLD-CLASS CITY WITHOUT YOU!
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
As anyone who’s worked with me — clients, team members, colleagues, vendors — knows, I adore Gusto Payroll. They truly changed my life for the better (not to mention the lives of thousands of small business owners) when they decided to create a tech-forward payroll company that seamlessly syncs with QuickBooks Online.
(Note: our affiliate link will earn you a $100 gift card after you run your first payroll — or up to $500 if you are an accountant or bookkeeper who signs up your own clients. We may earn a commission as well — win-win! For our own clients, we offer a 15% discount in lieu of referral fees.)
With so many of our own clients using Gusto, I wanted to share how to properly report S-Corp medical insurance premiums, and decided to make the information available to the public as well.
Much of the following information was collected from the Gusto Help section — which is freely available to the public — but as their dynamic support site changes structure and organization frequently, it seemed like collecting the various instructions into one area would be helpful.
Setting up benefits for S-Corp 2% shareholder-employees
For S-Corps, the IRS requires that health insurance premiums paid by the company to employees with a 2% or greater ownership be reported as wages (not pre-tax benefits), and included on their W-2s in Box 1, but not Boxes 3 or 5.
(This means that the total will be taxable for income taxes but not payroll taxes, and once the self-employed health insurance deduction is taken on the personal return, the wages and deduction net to zero — so in effect the corporation will have taken the deduction for the health insurance. More in this blog post and from the IRS here.)
Note: If your company’s benefits are provided through Gusto, they will manage this reporting for S-Corp owners automatically, as long as they are marked as a 2% shareholder in Gusto (under “Employment Details” in the shareholder-employee’s info in the “People” section).
However, if you offer benefits outside of Gusto (and use Gusto for payroll), then follow these steps to set up benefits for 2% shareholder employees:
Sign in to your Gusto admin account.
Go to the People section and select Team members.
Click on the employee’s name.
Under Employment Details, make sure the employee is designated as a 2% Shareholder.
Under Benefits, click Add Benefit.
Next to Select a Benefit, select “Create New Benefit” from the drop down menu.
Enter a Benefit Name.
Next to Benefit Type, select Medical, Dental, or Vision.
You will have the option to enter a Company Contribution Per Pay Period or Employee Deduction Per Pay Period. (For S-Corp shareholder-employees, this will usually be a company contribution, but check how your plan is set up.)
Company contributions: Taxable at the employee level only, for both federal and state income tax.
Employee deductions: Fully taxable as wages at both the employee and employer level.
Click Save.
As long as the entity is set up in Gusto as an S-Corp and the shareholder-employees that own 2% or more of the company are marked as such under Employee Details, the health insurance premium benefit should be added to Box 1, but not Boxes 3 or 5. You should review your draft W-2 at or shortly after year-end to make sure it is accurate, and contact Gusto immediately if there are issues so they can correct them before the final W-2 is issued and filed with the IRS and SSA.
FAQs about 2% shareholders:
Q: Which benefits must be taxed as wages for 2%+ shareholders?
A: Medical, Dental, Vision, HSAs, and more must be taxed as wages. Refer to Publication 15-B to view all a full list of benefits that are treated as wages.
Q: What if a 2%+ shareholder status changes part way through the year?
A: Change the 2%+ shareholder status in the employee’s account. Employees who are 2%+ shareholders at any point during the year must be taxed as such for the entire year.
Q: What happens if you need to update an employee’s 2%+ shareholder status mid-or-end year, and they have already received pre-tax benefit deductions this calendar year?
A: If your company withheld health insurance premiums rather than having them processed as 2%+ shareholder — contact Gusto Support, as their team will need to assist within adjusting the benefits, since there are tax implications.
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
Note: much of the information below was pulled from the old Polito Eppich website — however, they have since merged with another firm to become Magnus Blue, and as such have removed their former blog content. My 2018 blog post linking to their article on how to properly account for partnership and S-Corp health insurance to avoid double-dipping now points to a web archive of the original site — but since that’s hard to find, I’m borrowing some of their material and sharing it here as well. To-date it’s the most well-illustrated and to-the-point summary I’ve seen on the topic.
The IRS rules for reporting health insurance premiums for partnership and S-Corp owners are complex, and as a result, easy to accidentally bungle. Sometimes an entity will incorrectly deduct the premium, and so will the owner — on their personal return — leading to what is known as “double-dipping”. This usually happens when the person preparing the personal return did not also prepare the business entity return.
TL;DR? The most important take-aways are: 1) you can’t double-dip; and, 2) though the particular hoops that have to be jumped through are a) different for partnerships than for S-Corps, and b) a PITA for both, they are in fact the law and must be followed.
The key here is that when the entity pays for health insurance for owners, it is deducted as payments for services to the partners or S-Corp shareholders — who are then entitled to take the self-employed medical insurance deduction — which means it will net to zero deduction on the personal return. If you’re not careful, then the deduction is mistakenly taken on both the entity-level and personal returns. In their original article, Polito Eppich illustrated the accidental double-dipping (all charts are copyright of Polito Eppich).
We will use an example of a $10,000 medical insurance premium to illustrate this issue. Here’s what was happening (incorrect approach):
Income (Expense)
Passthrough Business Entity
Owner’s K-1
Owner’s Personal Return
Net Taxable Income
Medical premiums paid
$(10,000)
Ordinary income reduced
$(10,000)
$(10,000)
Self-employed medical insurance deducted
$(10,000)
(10,00)
Total effective deduction on owner’s return
$(20,000)
Accidental double-dipping — the $10k premium becomes $20k.
Here is how it should be handled:
PARTNERSHIPS
The actual deduction occurs at the partnership level and is passed to the partner — via lower income on the K-1.
If the partnership pays for the health insurance premiums for its partners, it deducts the expense as guaranteed payments and reports the amount to each partner on their respective K-1s as guaranteed payments.
The partner then picks up the guaranteed payment as income and reports “self-employed health insurance” deduction. The guaranteed payment offsets the self employed health insurance deduction for a net zero effect on taxable income, thus the single deduction described above on the K-1.
(When a partner pays his (her) own medical insurance premiums, the self-employed medical insurance deduction is allowed if there is self-employment income.)
Correct reporting for partnership:
Income (Expense)
Partnership
Owner’s K-1
Owner’s Personal Return
Net Taxable Income
Medical insurance premiums paid and deducted
$(10,000)
$(10,000)
$(10,000)
$(10,000)
Guaranteed payment to partner
10,000
10,000
10,000
Self-employed medical insurance deduction
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
Total effective deduction on owner’s return
$(10,000)
Partnership: by following the IRS rules, the $10k premium remains a $10k net deduction.
S-CORPORATIONS
S-Corps are a bit more complex because owners who work for the company are paid payroll via W-2 (rather than guaranteed payments to partners). Keep in mind that these rules only apply to shareholders who own more than 2% of the company. Owners below 2% are not eligible for the self-employed medical insurance deduction.
The S-corporation deducts the expense as compensation and includes the amount on the shareholder’s W-2 — in Box 1, but not in Boxes 3 or 5, which means they are not subject to Social Security or Medicare taxes (commonly known as “payroll taxes” or “employment taxes”). The amount should also be reported in box 14 of the W-2 — this is only for informational purposes, so that the personal tax preparer knows to take the deduction. Some payroll companies will track this reporting properly throughout the year, but others require a call at year-end to make sure this amount shows up properly in Box 1 and 14. (See my blog post on how to handle this for Gusto Payroll.)
The shareholder reports the compensation from their W-2, then deducts the health insurance amount noted in Box 14 on the W-2 as a “self-employed health insurance” deduction on the personal 1040. Because the amount is subject to income taxes, but not employment taxes, taking the self-employed health insurance deduction leads to a net-zero impact to taxable income. The actual deduction is achieved at the corporation level and passed to the shareholder in the form of lower income reported on the K-1.
Correct reporting by S Corporation for 2% or greater shareholders:
Income (Expense)
S-Corp
Shareholders’s K-1
Owner’s Personal Return
Net Taxable Income
Medical insurance premiums paid and deducted as owner wages lower ordinary income
$(10,000)
$(10,000)
$(10,000)
$(10,000)
Owner’s W-2
10,000
10,000
Greater than 2% shareholder medical insurance premium (Noted in Box 14 of W-2)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
Net taxable income reported by shareholder
$(10,000)
S-Corp: by following the IRS rules, the $10k premium remains a $10k net deduction.
Either way — partnership or S-Corp, the net result is that the amount paid by the company for health insurance on behalf of owners should only be deducted once, on the entity return, and as payments for services. On the personal return these payments will net to zero after the deduction for self-employed health insurance is taken.
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
The change in law requires Payment Servicing Entities (PSEs) and Third-Party Settlement Organizations (TPSOs) such as PayPal, CashApp, Venmo, Etsy, Poshmark, and eBay to lower their reporting thresholds — from 200 transactions and $20,000 to anyone receiving $600 or more; a pretty massive net that would inadvertently ensnare plenty of folks who do not actually have taxable income, but who would be receiving a 1099-K under the new rules. As a result, many who sold personal items at a non-deductible loss might end up with unexpected tax filing requirements. The point of the changes was to catch the many “side hustles”, where folks are providing services or buying and reselling goods on online platforms, in cases where the taxpayer is either intentionally or unintentionally evading taxes on the unreported income.
Although the intention was made in good faith to close the tax gap and encourage under-reporters to comply with the law, the unintended consequences threatened to overburden already struggling IRS representatives, accountants and bookkeepers, and their small business clients.
Contrast a side gig where someone is buying items from thrift stores and reselling them on Etsy for a sizable profit — a taxable event — with someone who is cleaning out their childhood home and selling their family’s old clothing and housewares at a loss. Both would receive a 1099-K, but the second person isn’t running a business, and the loss isn’t deductible. However, if either of these folks doesn’t declare the income, they can expect an underreporting notice from the IRS. At the end of the day, the person selling old personal possessions would get a “pass” from the IRS, but not before having to deal with confusing and scary notices, resulting in required responses that won’t be reviewed for months, given the backlog of unprocessed snail mail that persists at the IRS.
You can imagine why so many of us were concerned about this imminent change — statements from the AICPA, NATP, National Taxpayers Union Foundation and other professional organizations made it clear that the burden on the beleaguered IRS and tax preparers was simply unreasonable, and the timeframe for implementation too short. Some issuers were going to be issuing exponentially more forms than previously and did not have the systems in place yet to manage the increase. Per the NATP, “the new rules create an undue burden on taxpayers and the IRS, which is still wading through a backlog of returns.”
To be clear: the delay in implementing these lower thresholds for receipt reporting on a 1099-K does not mean that income from providing services or buying and reselling goods is not taxable. It already was, it continues to be, and starting next year, it will be much harder for those trying to shirk their reporting responsibilities to do so.
For 2022, reporting in early 2023, the existing 1099-K reporting threshold of $20,000 in payments from over 200 transactions will remain in effect.
But the year’s delay gives taxpayers and their advisers more time to set up bookkeeping systems — especially for those who have not previously recognized that this type of income is in fact taxable — and allows the IRS some time to catch up on their backlog and come up with an approach for mitigating the countless numbers of folks who do not have reporting responsibilities but will likely get caught with an underreporting notice. Similarly, those taxpayers using Payment Servicing Entities like PayPal can use the extra time to get educated about what types of receipts are NOT taxable — gifts, for example, or resale of your own personal goods at a loss — and work with their PSE to make sure they’re processing these types of receipts in a way that is more likely to exempt them from receiving a 1099-K (hopefully PayPal, Venmo and the like will set up more clearly established instructions about “personal” vs “business” transactions).
I, for one, am glad for the opportunity to get back to spending my time working with clients on value-added activities, such as tax planning and managerial decision-making — rather than jumping through more compliance hoops — after a very long three years.
The IRS recently announced that tax brackets would widen by nearly 7% for next tax year, to combat rapidly rising inflation. As a result of these and other changes made in an attempt to match the rising costs of groceries and other daily necessities, some Americans will find that when they file their 2023 tax returns, they may actually have lower tax bills than in the prior season.
Due to these new, wider tax brackets, taxpayers whose incomes have not kept pace with inflation may find that more of their taxable earnings fall into lower groupings–and therefore will owe comparatively less tax when they file than those whose incomes have increased with inflation.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer prices increased by around 8.2% in September compared to the same month last year, with grocery costs up by 13%. However, many workers have yet to see salary increases sufficient to keep up with inflation. In fact, in September, seasonally-adjusted average hourly wages decreased by 3% from the previous year.
According to the IRS, some 60 tax rules–including standard deductions for single and married taxpayers–will be adjusted to reflect these increased costs. Married couples’ standard deduction will increase by $1,800 to $27,700 from the prior year. For single filers, the standard deduction will be $1,3850–a $900 increase.
Marginal tax rates are also being updated for inflation. The lowest marginal tax rate of 10% now applies to single filers making $11,000 or less annually, which is up from $10,275. From $20,550 previously, couples can now earn $22,000 and still qualify for the 10% bracket. The qualifying transportation and parking benefit cap will increase by $20 to $300 per month.
What modifications are anticipated for 2023?
This year’s inflation rate also impacts the adjustments the IRS will make for next tax season, so that taxpayers can plan for 2023. Kiplinger provides a good breakdown and explanation, as well as charts for each filing status and income range, for both 2022 and 2023.
Substantial changes to tax brackets
The top income limit for married couples filing jointly for the 12% tax bracket will increase from $83,550 in 2022 to $89,450 in 2023. This could prevent some taxpayers from falling into a higher tax rate (and potentially a higher bill). The standard deduction, a fixed amount taxpayers can utilize to lower their taxable income, is also anticipated to increase significantly. According to Wolters Kluwer, married couples filing jointly in 2023 may claim up to $27,700, an increase from $25,900 in 2022.
Additional tax credits and limits on tax-advantaged contributions
The Child Tax Credit was modified substantially by the Biden Administration for tax year 2021 and increased to $3,600 to support those with families struggling from the pandemic, but it’s reverting to $2,000 for this tax year (absent any last-minute tax extenders from Congress). That could lead to what is called “refund shock”–where expectations of large pandemic-related refunds are unsubstantiated.
In some situations, increasing taxpayers’ contributions to certain tax-advantaged accounts can also reduce their taxable income. You can make an IRA contribution of up to $6,500 in 2023, up $500 from 2022–and those over 50 are allowed an additional catch-up contribution of $1,000. The contribution caps for 401(k) and other employer-sponsored retirement accounts will see significant hikes as well. People with health savings accounts (HSAs) may contribute up to $3,850 for individuals or $7,750 for a family in 2023. HSAs allow pre-tax contributions to pay for medical bills.
Conclusion
There is no assurance that tax bills will be lower, even though these changes may allow taxpayers to take a more generous standard deduction or put more money into accounts that could cut taxable income. This is because several things affect overall tax liability. Codification changes are intended to mitigate the effects of inflation; as a result, people whose earnings may not have kept pace with inflation may benefit, and others who did receive cost-of-living raises may at least avoid moving into a higher tax bracket. And a select number of us may be fortunate enough to pay less tax.
About The Co-Author: Lyle Solomon has extensive legal experience as well as in-depth knowledge and experience in consumer finance and writing. He has been a member of the California State Bar since 2003. He graduated from the University of the Pacific’s McGeorge School of Law in Sacramento, California, in 1998, and currently works for the Oak View Law Group in California as a Principal Attorney.
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
My colleagues at the National Society of Accountants for Cooperatives are offering a 75-minute webinar on Tuesday, August 23 to discuss the requirements and pitfalls in claiming Employee Retention Credits (ERC). The cost is free to members and $56 to non-members.
The ERC has been in the news quite a bit lately due to aggressive tactics by non-CPA firms claiming to be able to apply for these credits on behalf of business owners. (We’ll have an upcoming blog covering that topic.) However, the rules regarding whether or not a business qualifies are complex, and best performed by a knowledgeable professional.
During this webinar, the panelists will provide an overview of the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) and how to qualify for ERC including:
• Partial and full shutdowns as they apply to the ERC • What constitutes “gross receipts” • Safe Harbors • Rules for Large Employers • Unsettled matters and how the IRS is examining ERC claims
Participants are encouraged to submit questions in advance at info@nsacoop.org and during the session.
If you are an accountant or bookkeeper calculating these credits for your clients, or a business owner considering a DIY approach, please make sure you are thorough about obtaining education and resources before submitting anything to the IRS. You can expect their enforcement division to ramp up audits in the next few years.
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
(c) Matthew G. Bisanz, CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons
After Forbes reported in early July that starting a month earlier, tax professionals had noticed a higher-than-usual volume of CP-14 notices — the type typically issued when a taxpayer has a balance due on their account — the IRS has finally admitted that this is a systemic issue.
In a statement issued last week, the IRS indicated that no immediate action or phone call is needed: Taxpayers who receive a notice but paid the tax they owed in full and on-time (electronically or by check) should not respond to the notice.
However, many taxpayers are scared and confused by letters such as this — and they may not know how to determine whether they did in fact pay their taxes on-time. Maybe the check was lost in the mail; maybe they selected the wrong period or type of payment when using the IRS Direct Pay system; maybe they reported their estimated tax payments inaccurately. Unfortunately, because tax issues can be terrifying, it’s not uncommon to presume the IRS is correct and pay any balance due on a notice.
Never fear — there are solutions. The IRS online transcript service has undergone improvements in the past few years that make it relatively painless to obtain a PDF of all payment and return activity on your account. In fact, due to the number and complexity of governmental aid such as stimulus checks and the advance child tax credit, our CPA firm requires clients to obtain a transcript before we will finalize their return preparation (I’ve written up instructions here). And the IRS Online Account Center also lists other types of useful information taxpayers can access.
But… this all begs the important question: why did this happen?
According to Amber Gray-Fenner at Forbes, “In early June tax professionals on social media started reporting problems with electronic payments made by the taxpayer listed as the spouse on jointly filed returns. Specifically, CP-14 notices were being issued for accounts where an electronic payment was made by a spouse using IRS Direct Pay and the payment was not applied to the balance due on the jointly filed return.”
Accounting Today reported that, “In general, when certain payments are processed, programming does not move the payment to the married filing jointly account when the payment is:
Not electronic and is made by the secondary spouse.
Electronic, is made by the secondary spouse, and posts before the joint return indicator is present to identify the primary taxpayer.
Made by the secondary spouse using the Online Account ‘Make a Payment’ functionality.”
While this does line up with most of the issues tax professionals and their clients are seeing with these CP-14 balance due notices, it doesn’t jibe with our experience in past years. Spouses with separate tax payments have been filing jointly for many years, and the IRS Direct Pay system is not new — yet the number of these erroneous notices is far higher than in previous seasons.
Some tax professionals who have called the IRS’ Practitioner Priority Line (PPL) on behalf of their clients have been told by some IRS representatives that “there is no way of knowing” that the payment is for the jointly filed return and not some other tax debt that is attached to the spouse’s social security number. This is, quite simply, not correct. When making a payment using Direct Pay taxpayers must specify a reason for the payment (balance due, estimated payment, etc.), the tax form to which the payment applies (Form 1040, etc.) and the tax year to which the payment applies.
Screenshot of IRS Direct Pay list of Reasons, by Nancy McClelland, August 2, 2022
If the spouse of a taxpayer makes a Direct Pay payment for a balance due on a Form 1040 for a year that they filed jointly with their spouse (the primary taxpayer on the jointly filed return) there is really no reason that payment should not be automatically and correctly applied.
However, this is what the IRS currently maintains is the source of the problem. Complicating matters, the second bullet above — the one that references the “joint return indicator” — is specifically referring to taxpayers who e-filed and paid on the same day, and the payment was made by the second partner on the return. In this case, if the payment was made and posted to the IRS system before the return was electronically accepted and posted, it sounds like the IRS computers didn’t know that the balance due payment was related to the jointly filed return.
Now that the overburdened and understaffed agency recognizes that this is a systemic issue — after thousands of tax professionals reported it to the IRS Systemic Advocacy Management System (SAMS) — hopefully they will be able to rectify it soon (automatically removing the associated penalties and interest)… and more importantly, prevent it from causing problems next year. The AICPA has mentioned numerous times on their regular Town Hall series that erroneous notices just compound the problems at the IRS. They aren’t just stress-inducing for the client and irritating for their CPAs — they actually further gum up the works at an already struggling government agency. The IRS has as a result, put a temporary hold on certain types of automated notices, but the CP-14 is unfortunately not on the list.
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
This webinar should be of special interest to our readers, as it’s an interview with two small business owners who will walk through the experience that they had working with SCORE to access capital through different methods of financing, in different rounds throughout the stages of their business growth. For me, hearing “how we did it” from other small business owners is not only educational, but inspiring, and I hope this upcoming webinar will offer you both angles.
Wednesday, 8/10 Webinar at 3:00 PM How We Did It: Raising Capital for Your Business Presented by Score Chicago (Part of a Score Chicago Funding Webinar Series)
In this webinar, you will learn how two Chicago entrepreneurs, former SCORE Chicago clients, and founders of Tiesta Tea Dan Klein and Patrick Tannous raised 4 rounds of financing totaling over $8 million. Tiesta Tea has also used many different methods of funding including friends/family, factoring, purchase order (PO) financing, SBA loans, Angel Investors, and VC funding. Dan and Patrick will share their experiences raising capital during the different growth stages of their business.
Tiesta Tea is a company that used SCORE Chicago to get started in 2010. Dan and Patrick know first-hand how important mentorship is for aspiring entrepreneurs and established businesses seeking mentoring from SCORE to accelerate the growth and success of their businesses. The founders, Dan Klein and Patrick Tannous, started with nothing but an idea to sell tea, and fast-forward 10 years, they have sold over $54MM of their product. They sell their teas in thousands of retail stores, including Walmart, Jewel, Mariano’s, Amazon, Costco and many more.
The Chicago Department of Business Affairs & Consumer Protection (BACP) Entrepreneur Certificate Program is a free and optional program available to attendees of the free BACP business education workshop and webinar series.
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
On June 27th I woke to find dozens of notifications from MyTax Illinois in my email inbox — one for each and every client of ours who files sales taxes.
Just in case you got one or more of these yourself and haven’t logged in to check it out yet, here’s what it looks like —
It doesn’t give you much to go on — just a sort of “hey we saw you’re registered to file sales taxes, so you should read these four bulletins which may or may not apply and you’re unlikely to understand anyway” note.
But, if you dig through the bulletins you’ll find two in particular that could be important to a small business owner. One of them I covered in a recent blog post — Illinois Grocery Sales Tax Reduced by 1% For The Next 12 Months — it’s only likely to apply if you sell groceries that qualify for the low-tax food rate.
If you want to skip my rant and go to the section on what a small business owner should do next, scroll down to the next line in bold.
While I’m super-supportive about giving working families a break on prices — this is a terrible way to do it! It costs small businesses more in accounting and bookkeeping work than it could possibly save anyone.
It requires a small business owner — already overworked and without sufficient staff, and having in most cases barely survived the pandemic and still scraping to get by — to paw through every item in their Point of Sale system and change sales tax on an item-by-item basis. It’s hard enough to change sales tax amounts on a department-by-department basis… but item-by-item? Honestly, it will cost them so much more to figure this out than anyone will ever save on this “holiday”. And worse are the folks who don’t keep inventory in an automated system. They are stabbing in the dark and have no way to implement it at all. I just have to hope they don’t get audited by IDOR.
To make matters worse, the guidance says that the retail selling price per clothing item must be less than $125, and that supplies must be used by students in the course of study, in order to qualify. It’s simply impossible to program any Point of Sale system to create a sales tax discount on certain dollar-amounts of products and not others, or to change the sales tax rate on an individual item for some sales but not others (i.e., only after finding out that it will be used in the course of study at school). If small business owners are going to be able to comply with any of these rules, it will have to apply to all sales of a certain product — not just some sales.
This type of well-intentioned law — like the bag tax, carbonated beverage tax, and ill-fated sweetened beverage tax — has my full support from a social perspective. But they are so poorly-worded, difficult-to-enact, and misguided, that no small business could ever properly implement any of them cost-effectively.
This is just like that. Well-intentioned but completely out of touch and indicative that our representatives don’t have a clue what’s going on “on the ground”.
I received a hilarious text from a client when she read the IDOR notice:
Texts from a client when she read the IDOR notice.
As an aside, I wrote my state rep and begged him not to support this kind of thing in the future, and to work with other elected officials to find more reasonable, sustainable ways to provide relief to hard-working families, without crushing small business owners along the way. His response was truly wonderful, and he apologized profusely for not involving stakeholders in the last-minute rush to get it passed.
“Looks like we really did a terrible job here. You’re absolutely right that this was an example of government decision making at its worst. I think in the abstract these are largely good ideas, but looking at that guidance, it’s clear that implementation is going to be a nightmare. You have my word that I’ll try to do a better job of asking questions like “yes but is this feasible?” or “how much of an administrative burden is it placing on our small business owners?” when we’re contemplating things like this in the future.”
What does this mean for you, the small business owner? What are your next steps?
Follow these steps, in order, to determine what actions to take:
Step 1 – Check this list to see if you sell any products on it:
The great news is, that if you don’t sell any of these products, then you do not need to make any changes or do any extra work. However, I’d recommend rehearsing the phrase, “the sales tax holiday is only for back-to-school clothing and supplies, and as we don’t sell any items that would qualify, we aren’t able to offer you the 5% sales tax discount.” Because for sure there are going to be people who think that anything they buy during the 10-day period will be at a lower sales tax rate.
If you do sell products on the list above, then move on to the next step.
Step 2 – Identify all the products you sell that are on the list above. If any of the clothing items are priced at $125 or more, cross them off. Then make sure none of the remaining products you just identified are on this list of non-qualifying items:
Step 3 – Look at the items that made it onto your “qualified” list, and ask yourself who your clients generally are that buy these items — are they likely to be used for school? If the answer is definitely no, then again — no worries. You do not need to make any changes or do any additional work. (Except rehearsing that phrase from above and teaching it to your staff.)
However, if the answer is maybe or likely, then we’ve got some work to do.
Step 4 – If the answer is maybe, then you have to decide whether it’s worth your effort to go through your Point of Sale system and change the tax rate on each product that qualifies (and then change it back 10 days later) — or if you don’t have a POS system, if it’s worth it to figure out how to manually change the tax rate on each sale of one of these items, and to track how many were sold during the period of Aug 5-14. Because an alternative might be to just leave everything at the higher sales tax rate unless a customer specifically states that they are buying it for school use (you could even ask each customer who buys one of these items during that period if it’s for school use or not) — and then just give them a discount and write down the sale somewhere so that later on when you file your ST-1, you know how much to enter onto the Schedule GT so you get your money credited back to you — yes, I know that this means your cash drawer and your Sales Tax Payable accounts will be off. You can just have your accountant book an adjustment after the correct amount of tax is paid to the state. Or, in all honesty, you could even give them the discount out of the business’ own pocket and it would still be cheaper than reassigning tax rates in your POS system.
Step 5 – On the other hand, if the answer is likely, then you need to:
Create a new tax rate in your POS system called “holiday rate” that is 5 points lower than the current sales tax rate (in Chicago, 10.25% — so the new rate will be 5.25%). Hopefully your system allows enough rate slots to accommodate this. If not, maybe consider the approach outlined in Step 4.
After close of business on August 4th, assign that new rate to all the items that qualify.
Make a note to reassign the old rate to all those items after the close of business on August 14th.
Be sure you can run a report of all the items that sold at this rate, since you’ll need to declare that total on a separate tax form (Schedule GT) when you prepare your monthly sales tax return (ST-1).
If you do not have inventory or non-inventory sales-taxable items stored in your POS system — or if you have a cash register instead of a POS — then you’ll need to look at how you charge sales taxes to each item and come up with a plan that mimics the approach I just outlined. For example, if your system allows you to manually edit the sales tax rate on a sale-by-sale basis, you could keep a list of all the qualifying items by the register, and simply adjust for each qualifying sale. The problem is that only some of the items get the discounted rate, so if this is how your system works, you’d have to run a separate sale for all the qualifying items and then one for the non-qualifying items. You also will need to keep a list of all the sales made at the lower rate, since as mentioned above, you’ll have to note those on a separate schedule when you prepare your sales tax return. And if your system doesn’t allow you to manually edit the sales tax rate, you’ll have to take the approach I mentioned earlier, whereby you just give the customer a discount and adjust the inaccurate books later, hoping it all comes out in the wash.
Step 6 – Once the time comes to file your monthly (or quarterly) ST-1 sales tax return, you’ll notice there is an additional form– Schedule GT, Sales and Use Tax Holiday and Grocery Tax Suspension Schedule. This was created for retailers to report sales of qualifying items sold during the sales tax holiday. Per IDOR:
Form ST-1 has not changed. Retailers should continue to report their normal taxable sales, including sales of qualifying items, on Lines 4a and 4b, Lines 6a and 6b, or Lines 12a and 12b, of Form ST-1 and will then use Lines 2a and 2b, Lines 3a and 3b, or Lines 4a and 4b on Schedule GT to calculate a credit against the tax reported on those lines for the tax they are not collecting during the state sales tax holiday.
So you’ll report the sales of these items, on which you charged the lower tax amount, on Schedule GT and it will flow onto your ST-1 as a credit so that you’re not remitting more to the IDOR than you collected.
Whichever approach you take, make sure to rehearse the phrase, “the sales tax holiday is only for back-to-school clothing and supplies, and as we don’t sell any items that would qualify, we aren’t able to offer you the 5% sales tax discount.” Lots of folks read the headlines, but not the small print.
Hopefully this was all clearer to read than it felt to write it! And please make sure your state representative knows how you feel about having had to think about it in the first place. Small businesses have enough to deal with these days!
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
