Category Archives: IRS

Education, IRS, Software, Tips

How To Add Health Insurance To S-Corp 2%+ Owner W-2 In Gusto

Leave a comment

As anyone who’s worked with me — clients, team members, colleagues, vendors — knows, I adore Gusto Payroll. They truly changed my life for the better (not to mention the lives of thousands of small business owners) when they decided to create a tech-forward payroll company that seamlessly syncs with QuickBooks Online.

(Note: our affiliate link will earn you a $100 gift card after you run your first payroll — or up to $500 if you are an accountant or bookkeeper who signs up your own clients. We may earn a commission as well — win-win! For our own clients, we offer a 15% discount in lieu of referral fees.)

I have explained the importance in prior blog posts of making sure that S-Corp medical premiums are properly tracked and reported in QuickBooks and on the W-2 forms for shareholder-employees. The IRS has driven this point home repeatedly, and even has a page devoted to some issues that arise specific to owners of 2% or more of an S-Corp who perform services for the company.

With so many of our own clients using Gusto, I wanted to share how to properly report S-Corp medical insurance premiums, and decided to make the information available to the public as well.

Much of the following information was collected from the Gusto Help section — which is freely available to the public — but as their dynamic support site changes structure and organization frequently, it seemed like collecting the various instructions into one area would be helpful.

Setting up benefits for S-Corp 2% shareholder-employees

For S-Corps, the IRS requires that health insurance premiums paid by the company to employees with a 2% or greater ownership be reported as wages (not pre-tax benefits), and included on their W-2s in Box 1, but not Boxes 3 or 5.

(This means that the total will be taxable for income taxes but not payroll taxes, and once the self-employed health insurance deduction is taken on the personal return, the wages and deduction net to zero — so in effect the corporation will have taken the deduction for the health insurance. More in this blog post and from the IRS here.)

Note: If your company’s benefits are provided through Gusto, they will manage this reporting for S-Corp owners automatically, as long as they are marked as a 2% shareholder in Gusto (under “Employment Details” in the shareholder-employee’s info in the “People” section). 

However, if you offer benefits outside of Gusto (and use Gusto for payroll), then follow these steps to set up benefits for 2% shareholder employees:

  1. Sign in to your Gusto admin account.
  2. Go to the People section and select Team members.
  3. Click on the employee’s name.
  4. Under Employment Details, make sure the employee is designated as a 2% Shareholder.
  5. Under Benefits, click Add Benefit.
  6. Next to Select a Benefit, select “Create New Benefit” from the drop down menu.
  7. Enter a Benefit Name.
  8. Next to Benefit Type, select Medical, Dental, or Vision.
  9. You will have the option to enter a Company Contribution Per Pay Period or Employee Deduction Per Pay Period. (For S-Corp shareholder-employees, this will usually be a company contribution, but check how your plan is set up.)
  10. Company contributions: Taxable at the employee level only, for both federal and state income tax.
  11. Employee deductions: Fully taxable as wages at both the employee and employer level.
  12. Click Save.

As long as the entity is set up in Gusto as an S-Corp and the shareholder-employees that own 2% or more of the company are marked as such under Employee Details, the health insurance premium benefit should be added to Box 1, but not Boxes 3 or 5. You should review your draft W-2 at or shortly after year-end to make sure it is accurate, and contact Gusto immediately if there are issues so they can correct them before the final W-2 is issued and filed with the IRS and SSA.

FAQs about 2% shareholders:

Q: Which benefits must be taxed as wages for 2%+ shareholders?

A: Medical, Dental, Vision, HSAs, and more must be taxed as wages. Refer to Publication 15-B to view all a full list of benefits that are treated as wages. 

Q: What if a 2%+ shareholder status changes part way through the year?

A: Change the 2%+ shareholder status in the employee’s account. Employees who are 2%+ shareholders at any point during the year must be taxed as such for the entire year.

Q: What happens if you need to update an employee’s 2%+ shareholder status mid-or-end year, and they have already received pre-tax benefit deductions this calendar year?

A: If your company withheld health insurance premiums rather than having them processed as 2%+ shareholder — contact Gusto Support, as their team will need to assist within adjusting the benefits, since there are tax implications.

If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.

Education, IRS, Software, Tips

Partnership And S-Corp Medical Insurance Premiums For Owners: Avoid Double-Dipping

Leave a comment

Note: much of the information below was pulled from the old Polito Eppich website — however, they have since merged with another firm to become Magnus Blue, and as such have removed their former blog content. My 2018 blog post linking to their article on how to properly account for partnership and S-Corp health insurance to avoid double-dipping now points to a web archive of the original site — but since that’s hard to find, I’m borrowing some of their material and sharing it here as well. To-date it’s the most well-illustrated and to-the-point summary I’ve seen on the topic.

The IRS rules for reporting health insurance premiums for partnership and S-Corp owners are complex, and as a result, easy to accidentally bungle. Sometimes an entity will incorrectly deduct the premium, and so will the owner — on their personal return — leading to what is known as “double-dipping”. This usually happens when the person preparing the personal return did not also prepare the business entity return.

TL;DR? The most important take-aways are:
1) you can’t double-dip; and,
2) though the particular hoops that have to be jumped through are a) different for partnerships than for S-Corps, and b) a PITA for both, they are in fact the law and must be followed.

The key here is that when the entity pays for health insurance for owners, it is deducted as payments for services to the partners or S-Corp shareholders — who are then entitled to take the self-employed medical insurance deduction — which means it will net to zero deduction on the personal return. If you’re not careful, then the deduction is mistakenly taken on both the entity-level and personal returns. In their original article, Polito Eppich illustrated the accidental double-dipping (all charts are copyright of Polito Eppich).

We will use an example of a $10,000 medical insurance premium to illustrate this issue. Here’s what was happening (incorrect approach):
Income (Expense)Passthrough Business EntityOwner’s K-1Owner’s Personal ReturnNet Taxable Income
Medical premiums paid$(10,000)   
Ordinary income reduced $(10,000) $(10,000)
Self-employed medical insurance deducted  $(10,000)(10,00)
Total effective deduction on owner’s return   $(20,000)
Accidental double-dipping — the $10k premium becomes $20k.
Here is how it should be handled:

PARTNERSHIPS

The actual deduction occurs at the partnership level and is passed to the partner — via lower income on the K-1.

If the partnership pays for the health insurance premiums for its partners, it deducts the expense as guaranteed payments and reports the amount to each partner on their respective K-1s as guaranteed payments.

The partner then picks up the guaranteed payment as income and reports “self-employed health insurance” deduction. The guaranteed payment offsets the self employed health insurance deduction for a net zero effect on taxable income, thus the single deduction described above on the K-1.

(When a partner pays his (her) own medical insurance premiums, the self-employed medical insurance deduction is allowed if there is self-employment income.)

Correct reporting for partnership:
Income (Expense)PartnershipOwner’s K-1Owner’s Personal ReturnNet Taxable Income
Medical insurance premiums paid and deducted$(10,000)$(10,000)$(10,000)$(10,000)
Guaranteed payment to partner 10,00010,00010,000
Self-employed medical insurance deduction (10,000)(10,000)(10,000)
Total effective deduction on owner’s return   $(10,000)
Partnership: by following the IRS rules, the $10k premium remains a $10k net deduction.

S-CORPORATIONS

S-Corps are a bit more complex because owners who work for the company are paid payroll via W-2 (rather than guaranteed payments to partners). Keep in mind that these rules only apply to shareholders who own more than 2% of the company. Owners below 2% are not eligible for the self-employed medical insurance deduction.

The S-corporation deducts the expense as compensation and includes the amount on the shareholder’s W-2 — in Box 1, but not in Boxes 3 or 5, which means they are not subject to Social Security or Medicare taxes (commonly known as “payroll taxes” or “employment taxes”). The amount should also be reported in box 14 of the W-2 — this is only for informational purposes, so that the personal tax preparer knows to take the deduction. Some payroll companies will track this reporting properly throughout the year, but others require a call at year-end to make sure this amount shows up properly in Box 1 and 14. (See my blog post on how to handle this for Gusto Payroll.)

The shareholder reports the compensation from their W-2, then deducts the health insurance amount noted in Box 14 on the W-2 as a “self-employed health insurance” deduction on the personal 1040. Because the amount is subject to income taxes, but not employment taxes, taking the self-employed health insurance deduction leads to a net-zero impact to taxable income. The actual deduction is achieved at the corporation level and passed to the shareholder in the form of lower income reported on the K-1.

Correct reporting by S Corporation for 2% or greater shareholders:
Income (Expense)S-CorpShareholders’s K-1Owner’s Personal ReturnNet Taxable Income
Medical insurance premiums paid and deducted as owner wages lower ordinary income$(10,000)$(10,000)$(10,000)$(10,000)
Owner’s W-2  10,00010,000
Greater than 2% shareholder medical insurance premium (Noted in Box 14 of W-2) (10,000)(10,000)(10,000)
Net taxable income reported by shareholder   $(10,000)
S-Corp: by following the IRS rules, the $10k premium remains a $10k net deduction.

Either way — partnership or S-Corp, the net result is that the amount paid by the company for health insurance on behalf of owners should only be deducted once, on the entity return, and as payments for services. On the personal return these payments will net to zero after the deduction for self-employed health insurance is taken.

If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.

Education, IRS, Tips

Rejoice! IRS Delays Challenging 1099-K Reporting Changes Until Next Year

Leave a comment

Accountants, small business owners, IRS representatives, bookkeepers, and tax attorneys everywhere are breathing a sigh of relief today as the IRS — awaiting relief from Congress that never came — finally made the decision to push off the confusing and troublesome changes to 1099-K reporting for another year.

The change in law requires Payment Servicing Entities (PSEs) and Third-Party Settlement Organizations (TPSOs) such as PayPal, CashApp, Venmo, Etsy, Poshmark, and eBay to lower their reporting thresholds — from 200 transactions and $20,000 to anyone receiving $600 or more; a pretty massive net that would inadvertently ensnare plenty of folks who do not actually have taxable income, but who would be receiving a 1099-K under the new rules. As a result, many who sold personal items at a non-deductible loss might end up with unexpected tax filing requirements. The point of the changes was to catch the many “side hustles”, where folks are providing services or buying and reselling goods on online platforms, in cases where the taxpayer is either intentionally or unintentionally evading taxes on the unreported income.

Although the intention was made in good faith to close the tax gap and encourage under-reporters to comply with the law, the unintended consequences threatened to overburden already struggling IRS representatives, accountants and bookkeepers, and their small business clients.

Contrast a side gig where someone is buying items from thrift stores and reselling them on Etsy for a sizable profit — a taxable event — with someone who is cleaning out their childhood home and selling their family’s old clothing and housewares at a loss. Both would receive a 1099-K, but the second person isn’t running a business, and the loss isn’t deductible. However, if either of these folks doesn’t declare the income, they can expect an underreporting notice from the IRS. At the end of the day, the person selling old personal possessions would get a “pass” from the IRS, but not before having to deal with confusing and scary notices, resulting in required responses that won’t be reviewed for months, given the backlog of unprocessed snail mail that persists at the IRS.

You can imagine why so many of us were concerned about this imminent change — statements from the AICPA, NATP, National Taxpayers Union Foundation and other professional organizations made it clear that the burden on the beleaguered IRS and tax preparers was simply unreasonable, and the timeframe for implementation too short. Some issuers were going to be issuing exponentially more forms than previously and did not have the systems in place yet to manage the increase. Per the NATP, “the new rules create an undue burden on taxpayers and the IRS, which is still wading through a backlog of returns.”

To be clear: the delay in implementing these lower thresholds for receipt reporting on a 1099-K does not mean that income from providing services or buying and reselling goods is not taxable. It already was, it continues to be, and starting next year, it will be much harder for those trying to shirk their reporting responsibilities to do so.

For 2022, reporting in early 2023, the existing 1099-K reporting threshold of $20,000 in payments from over 200 transactions will remain in effect.

But the year’s delay gives taxpayers and their advisers more time to set up bookkeeping systems — especially for those who have not previously recognized that this type of income is in fact taxable — and allows the IRS some time to catch up on their backlog and come up with an approach for mitigating the countless numbers of folks who do not have reporting responsibilities but will likely get caught with an underreporting notice. Similarly, those taxpayers using Payment Servicing Entities like PayPal can use the extra time to get educated about what types of receipts are NOT taxable — gifts, for example, or resale of your own personal goods at a loss — and work with their PSE to make sure they’re processing these types of receipts in a way that is more likely to exempt them from receiving a 1099-K (hopefully PayPal, Venmo and the like will set up more clearly established instructions about “personal” vs “business” transactions).

Lastly, there’s some hope that Congress will revisit the situation and raise the reporting threshold from $600 — which many have argued is archaic — to something more like $5000 or $10,000. Time will tell.

I, for one, am glad for the opportunity to get back to spending my time working with clients on value-added activities, such as tax planning and managerial decision-making — rather than jumping through more compliance hoops — after a very long three years.

IRS

Rising inflation may result in some taxpayers paying smaller tax bills

Leave a comment
“Money” by Got Credit is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

The IRS recently announced that tax brackets would widen by nearly 7% for next tax year, to combat rapidly rising inflation. As a result of these and other changes made in an attempt to match the rising costs of groceries and other daily necessities, some Americans will find that when they file their 2023 tax returns, they may actually have lower tax bills than in the prior season. 

Due to these new, wider tax brackets, taxpayers whose incomes have not kept pace with inflation may find that more of their taxable earnings fall into lower groupings–and therefore will owe comparatively less tax when they file than those whose incomes have increased with inflation. 

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer prices increased by around 8.2% in September compared to the same month last year, with grocery costs up by 13%. However, many workers have yet to see salary increases sufficient to keep up with inflation. In fact, in September, seasonally-adjusted average hourly wages decreased by 3% from the previous year.

According to the IRS, some 60 tax rules–including standard deductions for single and married taxpayers–will be adjusted to reflect these increased costs. Married couples’ standard deduction will increase by $1,800 to $27,700 from the prior year. For single filers, the standard deduction will be $1,3850–a $900 increase.

Marginal tax rates are also being updated for inflation. The lowest marginal tax rate of 10% now applies to single filers making $11,000 or less annually, which is up from $10,275. From $20,550 previously, couples can now earn $22,000 and still qualify for the 10% bracket. The qualifying transportation and parking benefit cap will increase by $20 to $300 per month. 

What modifications are anticipated for 2023?

This year’s inflation rate also impacts the adjustments the IRS will make for next tax season, so that taxpayers can plan for 2023. Kiplinger provides a good breakdown and explanation, as well as charts for each filing status and income range, for both 2022 and 2023.

Substantial changes to tax brackets

The top income limit for married couples filing jointly for the 12% tax bracket will increase from $83,550 in 2022 to $89,450 in 2023. This could prevent some taxpayers from falling into a higher tax rate (and potentially a higher bill). The standard deduction, a fixed amount taxpayers can utilize to lower their taxable income, is also anticipated to increase significantly. According to Wolters Kluwer, married couples filing jointly in 2023 may claim up to $27,700, an increase from $25,900 in 2022.

Additional tax credits and limits on tax-advantaged contributions

The Child Tax Credit was modified substantially by the Biden Administration for tax year 2021 and increased to $3,600 to support those with families struggling from the pandemic, but it’s reverting to $2,000 for this tax year (absent any last-minute tax extenders from Congress). That could lead to what is called “refund shock”–where expectations of large pandemic-related refunds are unsubstantiated.

The Earned Income Credit, which benefits lower-income working taxpayers, was expanded to include both younger and older taxpayers last year, a change that has been made permanent.

In some situations, increasing taxpayers’ contributions to certain tax-advantaged accounts can also reduce their taxable income. You can make an IRA contribution of up to $6,500 in 2023, up $500 from 2022–and those over 50 are allowed an additional catch-up contribution of $1,000. The contribution caps for 401(k) and other employer-sponsored retirement accounts will see significant hikes as well. People with health savings accounts (HSAs) may contribute up to $3,850 for individuals or $7,750 for a family in 2023. HSAs allow pre-tax contributions to pay for medical bills.

Conclusion

There is no assurance that tax bills will be lower, even though these changes may allow taxpayers to take a more generous standard deduction or put more money into accounts that could cut taxable income. This is because several things affect overall tax liability. Codification changes are intended to mitigate the effects of inflation; as a result, people whose earnings may not have kept pace with inflation may benefit, and others who did receive cost-of-living raises may at least avoid moving into a higher tax bracket. And a select number of us may be fortunate enough to pay less tax.

About The Co-Author: Lyle Solomon has extensive legal experience as well as in-depth knowledge and experience in consumer finance and writing. He has been a member of the California State Bar since 2003. He graduated from the University of the Pacific’s McGeorge School of Law in Sacramento, California, in 1998, and currently works for the Oak View Law Group in California as a Principal Attorney.

If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.

Cooperatives, COVID-19 Financial Relief, Education, IRS, Tips

NSAC Offers Employee Retention Credit (ERC) Webinar Aug 23

Leave a comment
Employee Retention Credits (ERC) (nsacoop.org)

My colleagues at the National Society of Accountants for Cooperatives are offering a 75-minute webinar on Tuesday, August 23 to discuss the requirements and pitfalls in claiming Employee Retention Credits (ERC). The cost is free to members and $56 to non-members.

The ERC has been in the news quite a bit lately due to aggressive tactics by non-CPA firms claiming to be able to apply for these credits on behalf of business owners. (We’ll have an upcoming blog covering that topic.) However, the rules regarding whether or not a business qualifies are complex, and best performed by a knowledgeable professional.

During this webinar, the panelists will provide an overview of the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) and how to qualify for ERC including:

• Partial and full shutdowns as they apply to the ERC
• What constitutes “gross receipts”
• Safe Harbors
• Rules for Large Employers
• Unsettled matters and how the IRS is examining ERC claims

Participants are encouraged to submit questions in advance at info@nsacoop.org and during the session.

If you are an accountant or bookkeeper calculating these credits for your clients, or a business owner considering a DIY approach, please make sure you are thorough about obtaining education and resources before submitting anything to the IRS. You can expect their enforcement division to ramp up audits in the next few years.

Employee Retention Credits (ERC) (nsacoop.org)

If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.

IRS, Tips

IRS Mileage Rate Increase For Second-Half Of 2022

Leave a comment
Slide from AICPA Town Hall | (c) AICPA

Effective July 1, the IRS standard mileage rate — the amount that can be deducted per-mile in lieu of reporting actual costs — is increasing by 4-cents, to $0.65/mile, per Annoucement 2022-13.

The adjustment is being made in recognition of recent increases in the cost of gasoline. Normally, the adjustment is made annually, but in special cases such as this, the IRS Commissioner will make an exception.

Not only is this amount the official deductible amount when the optional standard method is used, but many businesses, and the federal government, also use it as the reimbursement rate for employee travel and transportation.

If you use a mileage-tracking template, make sure to update the per-mile multiplier. Most programs like Mile IQ do not track actual costs — they simply report the number based on a report’s date range, and the taxpayer or their CPA will do the math on the tax return. In 2011, the last time this happened, the IRS had a field for the number of miles driven Jan 1-June 30 and a separate field for those from July 1-Dec 31 — which is likely to be the case this year as well.

The 14 cents per mile rate for charitable organizations remains unchanged as it is set by statute.

IRS increases mileage rate for remainder of 2022 | Internal Revenue Service

If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.

Cooperatives, Education, IRS, Tips

National Society Of Accountants For Co-ops Upcoming Webinars

Leave a comment

I often write and speak about my experiences as a co-op accountant, and how challenging it was to become an expert in the field with so few resources. Things have changed a lot since back then, with the National Society of Accountants for Co-ops (NSAC), National Cooperative Business Association (NCBA), and the Co-op Professionals Guild (CPG) all offering online education.

The NSAC line-up for the next few months is seriously powerhouse. For anyone in the field or looking to get into it, I strongly recommend a membership, which gets you into all of these webinars below at no extra charge. That said, if you only want to know the specifics of one topic or another, they are affordably priced at $56 each for non-members.

Note: I am not paid or given a discount to promote NSAC — I just think they’re great!

Behavioral Ethics March 9, 2022 | 11:00 AM EST
FREE NSAC Members | $56 Non-Members 
CPE: 1 Credit Hour
As we continue to be challenged by an increasingly complex business environment, it is important to develop ethical reasoning skills that allow us to put ethical decision-making into practice. In this session, attendees will discover how to identify ethical paradigms and learn how stakeholders are impacted by their ethical choices. Additionally, participants will explore real-life cases that will allow them to rehearse ethical practices. Be prepared for any ethical dilemma and register now! Click for more info. 
Agricultural Economic Outlook April 5, 2022 | 11:00 AM EST
FREE NSAC Members | $56 Non-Members 
CPE: 1 Credit Hour
Want to know more about current and expected market conditions affecting agricultural co-ops? This CLN will address the core issues impacting the macroeconomy, agricultural commodity markets, and the agricultural economy with particular focus on the effects of COVID-19 and inflation. Attendees will get an outlook on the agricultural commodity markets; including corn, wheat, soybeans, rice, cotton, hay, cattle, hogs, and dairy, as well as the impact of rising production costs. Gain valuable insight into current market conditions by registering today! Click here for more info.
Financial Ratios for Agricultural Co-ops April 20, 2022 | 11:00 AM EST
FREE NSAC Members | $56 Non-Members 
CPE: 1 Credit Hour 
Designed specifically for Agricultural Co-ops, this session will explore how to analyze company performance based on an evaluation of financial statements, and introduce ratios used in the financial analysis of cooperatively structured organizations. Learn what to look for when comparing a company to its peers and industry norms, and how to analyze company performance compared to strategic business objectives. Take advantage of this revealing CLN today! Click here for more info.
Financial Ratios for Electric Co-ops April 20, 2022 | 2:00 PM EST
FREE NSAC Members | $56 Non-Members 
CPE: 1 Credit Hour
Designed specifically for Electric Co-ops, this session will explore how to analyze company performance based on an evaluation of financial statements, and introduce ratios used in the financial analysis of cooperatively structured organizations. Learn what to look for when comparing a company to its peers and industry norms, and how to analyze company performance compared to strategic business objectives. Don’t miss out on this engaging session! Click here for more info. 
Tax Update April 28, 2022 | 11:00 AM EST 
FREE NSAC Members | $56 Non-Members 
CPE: 1 Credit Hour
This session will bring attendees the latest and up-to-date tax law changes and new tax return reporting items. Additionally, the CLN will explore any anticipated future tax law changes. Some of the topics that will be covered include: Meals and Entertainment, 163(j) Interest Expense Limitation, Net Operating Losses, R&D Tax Credit Update, and State Taxes Post Wayfair. Stay informed about the latest developments that are most likely to affect your organization with this 60-minute zoom! Click here for more info.
Processing of Work Orders for Electric Co-ops May 5, 2022 | 2:00 PM EST
FREE NSAC Members | $56 Non-Members 
CPE: 1 Credit Hour
In this CLN, participants will review the accounting process for construction and retirement of utility plant from the work order stage to unitization. This will include the audit perspective of this process, along with industry trends and common mistakes to avoid. Sign up today for this exclusive guidebook to processing work orders! Click here for more info.
Navigating New FASB Guidance: Your 2022 Guide May 12, 2022 | 2:00 PM EST 
FREE NSAC Members | $56 Non-Members 
CPE: 1 Credit Hour
Join us for an informative overview of new FASB standards that could impact your organization. This session will explore recent developments in the financial accounting standards relevant to cooperatives. Guest speakers Randy Throener and Amy Schreck will discuss the latest FASB guidance so attendees can successfully implement these recent amendments. Take advantage of this educational CLN! Click here for more info.
How Electricity and Demand Really Work & How it Impacts Rates May 19, 2022 | 11:00 AM EST
FREE NSAC Members | $56 Non-Members 
CPE:1 Credit Hour
As cooperatives consider moving from traditional to more innovative rate design structures, it is increasingly important to understand the different billing units required for each innovative design. Three-part, Four-part, Time-of-use, Critical peak, Super off-peak, and other innovative rate designs require an understanding of and access to a range of billing units. These include Non-coincident demands, Coincident demands, Time-based energy usage, KVar, and more. In this encore session from TFACC 2021, attendees will learn some of the billing units required for innovative rate designs, and explore some of the challenges involved in obtaining, using, and explaining them to members. Don’t miss out on this specialized presentation! Click here for more info.
Education, IRS, Tips

Reasonable Compensation Stress Test & Resources

Leave a comment

This isn’t the first time I’ve posted about the useful resources offered by RCReports — but as it turns out, it’s been a while. Apparently I take it for granted that everyone knows about Reasonable Compensation requirements all too often, and then I regularly discover that it’s just not true.

Note: I am a loyal paid subscriber to RCReports, and receive no compensation or discounts for promoting their service or resources. I just think they’re great.

In any case, recently I was asked by a colleague to train her on the basics of Reasonable Compensation and walk through my process. I asked her to do these three pieces of homework first:

  1. Read this article about stress-testing the RC amount – How to Stress Test a Reasonable Compensation Figure – RCReports
  2. Watch this 2-hour RC Reports training session – Reasonable Compensation for S Corps on Vimeo
    (tip for professionals – this class is sometimes offered on CPAacademy for free, with CPE credit included).
  3. Watch this 1-hour RC Reports demo – RCReports Product Demo – RCReports

I know most non-accountants won’t bother with the 2-hour training session that walks through court cases and the history of Reasonable Compensation audits and challenges. And certainly folks who are not in the business of performing these calculations aren’t likely to bother with the 1-hour demo.

But anyone running their own corporation, and those considering electing S-corp status, will want to read about stress-testing. This is something you can do regardless of the calculation process, or how you got to the salary amount in the first place. A helpful excerpt (edited) from the article:

There are six main factors or tests (the IRS lists even more), but “applying just the first three will usually tell you whether a compensation is reasonable or not. In other words – three strikes and you’re out.”

1) Training and experience: Does $X/year seem like enough compensation for somebody who has this level of training and experience?
2) Duties and responsibilities: Does $X/year seem like enough compensation for someone with these duties and responsibilities?
3) Time and effort devoted to the business: Does $X/year seem like enough compensation for someone who worked this many hours/week?

But what if the company can’t afford to pay reasonable compensation? I hear that question a lot, as you might imagine. That’s a common situation, and a simple answer — you’re not required to pay yourself the entire amount of salary… it just means that you can’t issue distributions until it has been paid. “The amount of reasonable compensation will never exceed the amount received by the shareholder either directly or indirectly.” And no fair holding off on paying salary for years while building up retained earnings and then issuing a huge distribution in the first year you pay yourself salary. The IRS knows that trick as well. RCReports writes more about the issue in this article — check out Example 4 in particular for information about the look-back period.

There are different methods of determining Reasonable Compensation — yes, I’m referencing yet additional RCReports articles for details — the cost approach, market approach, and income approach. The Cost Approach generally works best for small businesses where the business owner provides multiple services for the business (wears many hats).

The key with all of these resources is to get shareholder-employees to take a closer look at their own salaries and make sure they are following IRS guidelines. Stress-testing is a great place to start, but for a more thorough approach to calculating Reasonable Compensation, I recommend contacting a CPA with background in this area who can walk you through an RC interview and help you support the amount you ultimately choose.

If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.