Thanks yet again, and as always, to Lisa Simpson from the AICPA Town Hall for her regular updates on what’s going on with Employee Retention Credit processing at the IRS. I can trust this team to make sure I’m getting the latest information, free from rumors and gossip, and that I’m able to both quell my clients’ concerns and also manage their expectations.
I had just been hearing some rumblings in one of my professional associations — someone had said, “seems inevitable that anyone who filed an ERC claim after September 2023 will need to file a lawsuit to get the claim paid,” and went on to suggest that it would be a great opportunity for a law firm, and wanted to know if we had referrals in this space.
First off, it made me nervous — our remaining ERC claims, all for deserving small business and non-profit clients of a colleague, worked really hard to make sure we had what we needed to submit their claims by January 31st, 2024, since there was pending legislation that might retroactively end the program after that date. They all were informed that it might be a year or more before they received the money, given the IRS moratorium — but certainly none of us expected to line the pockets of an attorney in order to get the claims paid out. And in fact, the claims were mostly small enough that my guess is most lawyers wouldn’t bother with them.
Secondly… it made me suspicious. On what basis was this guy saying a lawsuit would be “inevitable”? I attend every single AICPA Town Hall and hadn’t heard anyone suggest this. And what a sad thing to suggest it would be a “great opportunity” for a law firm — to specialize in making money off those desperate to finally receive what they and their accountants had already worked so hard to obtain.
As usual, I decided to quell those fears until the next AICPA Town Hall, and I’m so glad I did, as Lisa Simpson made ERC the first topic in her Technical Update. She explained the recent IRS news release that likely triggered the unfounded rumblings I was hearing, as well as referenced a new Journal of Accountancy article that delved deeper.
My takeaway was that: while 10-20% of claims are clearly fraudulent, and the IRS is in the process of denying them; and another 60-70% show an unacceptable level of risk and will be examined carefully — there are also between 10% and 20% of the claims show a low risk. The IRS “will begin judiciously processing” more of these claims, and, according to the release, expects some of these payments to be made later this summer.
To me, that’s all good news. It means they’re working through the piles and expediting the ones that have straightforward claims where the businesses played by the rules, processing the oldest ones first. The rest will be examined more critically, or in the case of blatant fraud, flat-out denied.
The one disappointing piece of information is that no claims submitted during the moratorium will be processed at this time. But at least we know the backlog is being cleared to make way for them. Since the moratorium was put in place, the IRS has received over 17,000 claims per week.
I’ve let my clients know that they shouldn’t budget for these dollars for at least another year, but that there’s no reason to presume they won’t eventually receive the claims that are due to them.
And yet again I learned that if something sounds sensational and suspicious… it might not be grounded in evidence and analysis. Rely only on your trusted advisors for the education and resources that will help you guide your small business clients. (And then provide links to those resources to the sensationalists who spread misinformation.)
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
The IRS is offering an amazing deal to those who either fraudulently or mistakenly claimed Employee Retention Credits (ERC) to which they weren’t entitled.
If a taxpayer claimed and received ERC funds, and for whatever reason now realizes that they may not actually have qualified (either for a particular period or for the whole thing) — they can return 80% of the money to the IRS and call it a day.
Considering that more than 3.6 million claims have been submitted, and the IRS refunds run up to $26,000 per employee… we’re talking about big dollars here. As of July 31, 2023, the IRS Criminal Investigation division had initiated 252 investigations involving over $2.8 billion of potentially fraudulent ERC claims.
We were extremely diligent in filing ERC claims for our clients — it took literally months of effort in research, software development, calculations, data collection, interviews and narrative-writing, not to mention preparing the actual tax forms and support. So initially I was extremely frustrated to find that people who filed claims without substantiation could return only 80% of the money and keep 20% for themselves. However, IRS Commissioner Werfel explained the rationale behind this decision, as reported by Journal of Accountancy:
“We could not stand idly by as small businesses were being taken advantage of by promoters trying to get hefty fees,” he said. He later described the 80% figure as “an important incentive to participate in the disclosure program. Participating businesses do not need to repay all 100% of the payment they receive.”
And this makes sense. Not just our clients, but our own firm (which decidedly does not qualify for ERC) was bombarded by calls and official-looking forms designed to lure us in to thinking that we were entitled to this “free money”. And they charged exorbitant fees in the 20-30% range, without providing any of the substantiation a taxpayer would need in case of audit. As a result, these scams topped the list of the IRS “Dirty Dozen” in 2023.
So it’s not surprising that, although the process to participate in the voluntary disclosure program is quite easy and simple — one of the requirements is that the applicant must provide names, addresses, and phone numbers of any advisers or tax preparers who helped with the claim, as well as details about the services provided. I’m hoping that this will cause some of these “mills” to get what they deserve for defrauding small businesses and our government.
Taxpayers wishing to participate in the ERC voluntary disclosure program must notify the IRS by completing and submitting Form 15434, Application for Employee Retention Credit Voluntary Disclosure Program. Program participants will not be charged underpayment interest, and the IRS will not assert civil penalties against them for underpayment of employment tax attributable to the ERC. And those that cannot repay the required 80% might be considered for an installment agreement.
If you are among those who has submitted a claim that hasn’t been approved yet (or received your checks but have not yet cashed them), you can still withdraw your claim, following instructions on the IRS ERC FAQ (#5 under “Correcting an ERC Claim”). They even include a sample withdrawal form.
I’ve interviewed countless ERC claim companies and narrowed it down to only two with whom I have trusted my colleagues and their clients. (It’s truly stunning how many out there have no idea what they’re doing, even the ones that aren’t intentionally skirting the rules.) One of them, Tri-Merit, recently released an episode of Randy Crabtree’s Unique CPA Podcast that dives into the biggest ERC changes for 2024. The service of theirs I recommend the most often (for which I can offer a referral link) is their “ERC Verification” offering, where they take a look at what you’ve claimed and either verify that it was done correctly, or recommend changes and help process the amendments. They stress that it is never too late to fix a claim that has already been paid.
And for those of you who have filed accurate ERC claims and are still waiting for the IRS to end its moratorium — still no information on when processing will begin again. Keep your eye on the AICPA’s ERC Resource Center; or check in with my blog — I’ll be one of the first to joyfully report it when the time comes!
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
(Many thanks to the AICPA Town Hall for allowing members to leverage their resources, such as the slides included in this article. The opinions shared here are the author’s and not those of AICPA or CPA.com.)
Tax preparers everywhere spent the past two months gearing up for yesterday’s “opening day” of tax season, January 29th. It was an exciting time for us, as it was finally going to be a return to normal. What does that even mean anymore, you might ask? Well, most of the pandemic financial relief programs have wrapped up (save a straggler ERC claim here or there); amendments resulting from that era have almost all been filed; the odd rebates and credits that no one remembered the amounts for were a thing of the past; there were no last-minute tax extenders; and the season end-date actually lands on April 15th for the first time in ages. It felt like we finally had a handle on things and were back to the “normal” amount of seasonal overwork — rather than a Herculean lift, as was the case for the past four years.
Enter Congress. Despite the fact that The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), National Association of Tax Professionals (NATP) and small business advocacy groups have been lobbying for over a year to get an extension of certain popular tax benefits that expired in 2023, our leaders somehow managed to wait until after year-end to introduce legislation to that effect — Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act — in a spectacular show of bipartisan ignorance. Never mind that the IRS e-file has been offline since November 18th, because it takes over two months to reprogram the systems for new tax laws, updates, and edits to tax forms.
Some of the anticipated changes if the legislation passes as-written include popular business expensing programs that are designed to be leveraged throughout the year. Making them retroactive does nothing to spur the economy, as the decisions to buy equipment, invest in R&D, or take out loans were already made, last year.
To be clear: I’m not saying these aren’t potentially good changes for tax law, business, and the economy. Just that doing it at this late date is misguided in far too many ways.
And the part I really don’t understand is this: IRS Commissioner Werfel told reporters last Friday, “If there’s a change that impacts your return, we will make the change, and we will send you the update — whether it’s an additional refund or otherwise — without you having to take additional steps.” This is simply impossible for most of the business expensing features of the law, which are voluntary elections on the part of the taxpayer. Presumably this is a reference to the child tax credit provisions in the legislation — which have gotten the most press, but have little effect on small business owners, and are a small portion of the actual bill.
The House Ways and Means Committee released a statement recently indicating that the IRS “confirmed its intention to make necessary systems updates by around six weeks after the date of enactment”. Six weeks. Most refunds are issued within three. Six weeks takes us past the S-Corp and Partnership filing deadline. Six weeks?
Speaking of that deadline, many states announced e-filing would begin on the same date as the IRS opened federal tax season, but it turns out that our state (and I’m guessing others) did not release their S-Corp or Partnership forms with enough advance notice for our third-party tax software to program them into their system, so we are unable to e-file any Illinois business tax returns until February 7th. And we were freaking out about that delay. I can’t imagine what six weeks will look like.
To say nothing of the fact that the next government shutdown deadline is scheduled for one week before business tax returns are due. This should make for an even more laid-back season.
And to add to all of this, that the bill is being funded by an early end to the Employee Retention Credit program, as of January 31, 2024. We spent all of last week scrambling to get the remaining claims in, and won’t know whether that sprint was worth the anxiety or not until this bill passes (or doesn’t) — I feel terrible for those who find out in February that their claim’s due date is suddenly in the past.
Again, some of the provisions in this bill are great ideas — well thought-through, balanced, as well as good for business, families, and potentially the economy. Bad players in the world of ERC mills will finally have to deal with some consequences, and the 1099 burden for small vendors and freelancers will be eased as the threshold is finally indexed for inflation. Some good stuff.
So let’s pass this as 2024 legislation, just in time for the new year, as it should be… and get out of the way of tax season, already!
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
I wrote a fabulously comprehensive article for MSN back in March about the various types of IRS transcripts, what they’re for, why you’d use one versus another, and how to download them. Some of my finest work, if you ask me… but today you don’t care about that. You just need to hurry up and file your tax return by Monday, October 16th, and you can’t find any of the paperwork you carefully saved to your Mac desktop, only to have it be deleted during an update. (Yes, this is a thing. I’ve had it happen to two clients already.)
Whatever the reason for not being able to find your tax documents, you still have to get that return filed by Monday. Lucky for you, most of these documents are listed on what is called a “wage and income transcript”. The beauty of a wage and income transcript is that every one of those documents sent to you – they’re called “information returns” – is also sent to the IRS, with your social security number as a unique identifier. If you download this list of documents from the IRS, you get a summary of everything filed on your behalf.
Can’t find some of your W-2s from working several jobs?
Not sure whether your freelance gig issued a 1099-NEC? Or maybe you lost track of countless different contract work payments?
You’re pretty sure you have an old dividend- or interest-bearing account given to you by your grandparents but can’t ever find the form they mailed?
Do you pay student loan interest, tuition, or mortgage interest and you can’t find the forms because you moved during the year?
Though it takes the IRS a few months to post all these to your transcript (or longer, if the issuing company filed an extension), by this point in the season, everything should be there, and you’ll be able to prepare your tax return after all — even if you lost the originals that came in the mail or can’t figure out where you saved the PDFs.
And the best news where downloading a transcript is concerned? All you need is a photo ID, a mobile phone with a camera, an email address, and an Internet connection.
Keep in mind that the IRS will not email you a transcript; you must go online and create or log in to your account and download it. There are email scams out there that entice folks to click on a link or attachment with the promise of an IRS Online transcript – don’t fall prey.
“How Can I Download My IRS Transcript?”
1. From the IRS website, you’ll need to create an ID.me account. (This is the most involved of the steps, but thankfully you only have to do it once; moving forward, you’ll simply sign into the same account each time.) The ID.me website uses facial recognition to confirm your identity, so you’ll need your phone to take a selfie.
If you need help creating your ID.me account, the ID.me Help Center spells out the process very clearly. You can also watch this video or review these written instructions if you want to review the process first.
2. Once your account is created, log in, go to the IRS’s Get Transcript page and click the “Get Transcript Online” button.
3. Select the reason you need a transcript (it’s fine to just select “Other”).
4. Leave the Customer File Number blank and click “Go.” The screen will display all four (or five, if you have non-filing years) transcript options and the available years.
5. Under Wage & Income Transcript, select the tax-filing year.
6. After you select your transcript, like magic, a PDF will pop up in a new tab of your browser with all the information you need. (Or it will say “No record of return filed,” if nothing has posted yet.)
7. Print the file to PDF and save it somewhere safe, along with the rest of your tax season documents.
As explained above, your wage and income transcript will list all forms W-2, 1099, 1098, and 5498 that have been processed by the IRS so far for the tax year in question.
For most taxpayers, that’s all you need. But some people also can’t remember how much they paid in estimated taxes, or if they took last year’s refund and credited it forward, or they need to review last year’s return to jog their memory about this-or-that. If you’re one of those folks — no worries, I got you covered: but you need to read the longer version of this post that I shared back in March.
No need to panic — you got this. Now go file that tax return on time… for 2023, the extension deadline is Monday, October 16th, by midnight in your time zone. Yes, submitting your taxes is nerve-wracking, but it’s way better than the alternative, and with a handy list from the IRS of all your documents in one place, you’re one step ahead of most of the other taxpayers who haven’t filed yet!
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
(c) Matthew G. Bisanz, CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons
After Forbes reported in early July that starting a month earlier, tax professionals had noticed a higher-than-usual volume of CP-14 notices — the type typically issued when a taxpayer has a balance due on their account — the IRS has finally admitted that this is a systemic issue.
In a statement issued last week, the IRS indicated that no immediate action or phone call is needed: Taxpayers who receive a notice but paid the tax they owed in full and on-time (electronically or by check) should not respond to the notice.
However, many taxpayers are scared and confused by letters such as this — and they may not know how to determine whether they did in fact pay their taxes on-time. Maybe the check was lost in the mail; maybe they selected the wrong period or type of payment when using the IRS Direct Pay system; maybe they reported their estimated tax payments inaccurately. Unfortunately, because tax issues can be terrifying, it’s not uncommon to presume the IRS is correct and pay any balance due on a notice.
Never fear — there are solutions. The IRS online transcript service has undergone improvements in the past few years that make it relatively painless to obtain a PDF of all payment and return activity on your account. In fact, due to the number and complexity of governmental aid such as stimulus checks and the advance child tax credit, our CPA firm requires clients to obtain a transcript before we will finalize their return preparation (I’ve written up instructions here). And the IRS Online Account Center also lists other types of useful information taxpayers can access.
But… this all begs the important question: why did this happen?
According to Amber Gray-Fenner at Forbes, “In early June tax professionals on social media started reporting problems with electronic payments made by the taxpayer listed as the spouse on jointly filed returns. Specifically, CP-14 notices were being issued for accounts where an electronic payment was made by a spouse using IRS Direct Pay and the payment was not applied to the balance due on the jointly filed return.”
Accounting Today reported that, “In general, when certain payments are processed, programming does not move the payment to the married filing jointly account when the payment is:
Not electronic and is made by the secondary spouse.
Electronic, is made by the secondary spouse, and posts before the joint return indicator is present to identify the primary taxpayer.
Made by the secondary spouse using the Online Account ‘Make a Payment’ functionality.”
While this does line up with most of the issues tax professionals and their clients are seeing with these CP-14 balance due notices, it doesn’t jibe with our experience in past years. Spouses with separate tax payments have been filing jointly for many years, and the IRS Direct Pay system is not new — yet the number of these erroneous notices is far higher than in previous seasons.
Some tax professionals who have called the IRS’ Practitioner Priority Line (PPL) on behalf of their clients have been told by some IRS representatives that “there is no way of knowing” that the payment is for the jointly filed return and not some other tax debt that is attached to the spouse’s social security number. This is, quite simply, not correct. When making a payment using Direct Pay taxpayers must specify a reason for the payment (balance due, estimated payment, etc.), the tax form to which the payment applies (Form 1040, etc.) and the tax year to which the payment applies.
Screenshot of IRS Direct Pay list of Reasons, by Nancy McClelland, August 2, 2022
If the spouse of a taxpayer makes a Direct Pay payment for a balance due on a Form 1040 for a year that they filed jointly with their spouse (the primary taxpayer on the jointly filed return) there is really no reason that payment should not be automatically and correctly applied.
However, this is what the IRS currently maintains is the source of the problem. Complicating matters, the second bullet above — the one that references the “joint return indicator” — is specifically referring to taxpayers who e-filed and paid on the same day, and the payment was made by the second partner on the return. In this case, if the payment was made and posted to the IRS system before the return was electronically accepted and posted, it sounds like the IRS computers didn’t know that the balance due payment was related to the jointly filed return.
Now that the overburdened and understaffed agency recognizes that this is a systemic issue — after thousands of tax professionals reported it to the IRS Systemic Advocacy Management System (SAMS) — hopefully they will be able to rectify it soon (automatically removing the associated penalties and interest)… and more importantly, prevent it from causing problems next year. The AICPA has mentioned numerous times on their regular Town Hall series that erroneous notices just compound the problems at the IRS. They aren’t just stress-inducing for the client and irritating for their CPAs — they actually further gum up the works at an already struggling government agency. The IRS has as a result, put a temporary hold on certain types of automated notices, but the CP-14 is unfortunately not on the list.
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
Effective July 1, the IRS standard mileage rate — the amount that can be deducted per-mile in lieu of reporting actual costs — is increasing by 4-cents, to $0.65/mile, per Annoucement 2022-13.
The adjustment is being made in recognition of recent increases in the cost of gasoline. Normally, the adjustment is made annually, but in special cases such as this, the IRS Commissioner will make an exception.
Not only is this amount the official deductible amount when the optional standard method is used, but many businesses, and the federal government, also use it as the reimbursement rate for employee travel and transportation.
If you use a mileage-tracking template, make sure to update the per-mile multiplier. Most programs like Mile IQ do not track actual costs — they simply report the number based on a report’s date range, and the taxpayer or their CPA will do the math on the tax return. In 2011, the last time this happened, the IRS had a field for the number of miles driven Jan 1-June 30 and a separate field for those from July 1-Dec 31 — which is likely to be the case this year as well.
The 14 cents per mile rate for charitable organizations remains unchanged as it is set by statute.
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
This Journal of Accountancy article walks through the particular scenario where this relief — only for tax year 2021 — applies. They note that:
The relief announced Wednesday applies where:
In tax year 2021, the direct partners in the domestic partnership are not foreign partnerships, foreign corporations, foreign individuals, foreign estates, or foreign trusts.
In tax year 2021, the domestic partnership or S corporation has no foreign activity, including foreign taxes paid or accrued or ownership of assets that generate, have generated, or may reasonably be expected to generate foreign-source income (see Regs. Sec. 1.861-9(g)(3)).
In tax year 2020, the domestic partnership or S corporation did not provide to its partners or shareholders, nor did the partners or shareholders request, the information on the form or its attachments regarding:
Line 16, Form 1065, Schedules K and K-1 (line 14 for Form 1120-S), and
Line 20c, Form 1065, Schedules K and K-1 (controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies, 1120-F, Sec. 250, Sec. 864(c)(8), Sec. 721(c) partnerships, and Sec. 7874) (line 17d for Form 1120-S).
The domestic partnership or S corporation has no knowledge that the partners or shareholders are requesting such information for tax year 2021.
To learn more, I recommend this excellent Compass Tax Free 10-Minute Webinar update from 2/17/22 on the new FAQ relief for partnerships and S corporations with Thomas Gorczynski, EA USTCP, and Kevin J. Todd, EA, CPA.
(Our original blog post is below, for context and reference.)
K-2 Mountain (courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)
Yes, that photo is of K-2, the second-highest mountain on Earth, where apparently one person dies on the mountain for every four that reach the summit. (Didn’t expect that to show up in my search for a common-usage-right image of an IRS K-2 form.)
The good news is that — as frustrating and arduous as this new IRS K-2 and K-3 reporting requirement is — no one is likely to die while attempting to complete it, and therefore I think we should just all keep this extremely challenging K-2 mountain in mind before we get too frustrated about additional complexities in tax preparation.
In all seriousness, here’s the story: 1) The IRS, in an attempt to deter fraud, for 2021 began requiring all pass-through entities to disclose foreign transactions as part of the tax returns and the K-1 package to shareholders and partners. 2) Initially, the new schedules were only to be used by entities with international transactions to report. 3) In mid-January, the IRS issued revised instructions for the schedules that may require domestic partnerships and S corporations without any foreign source income or assets to prepare Schedules K-2 and K-3. 4) If even one of the partners or shareholders plans to or is required to report foreign tax credits on Form 1116, Foreign Tax Credit, the Partnership or S-Corp must prepare Schedules K-2 and K-3. 5) As a result, the complex and comprehensive “reporting requirement applies to a much larger percentage of pass-through-entity (PTE) returns than perhaps the IRS intended”, as Forbes pointed out.
“This seems like an overly burdensome requirement to quietly clarify in the middle of filing season.” – Tom Gorczynski, EA
All is not lost. Yes, we’re talking about well-over 20 additional pages of tax forms — but it’s likely that you won’t have to fill them all out. An exception from filing Part II and Part III, Section 2, on Schedule K-3 may apply for a pass-through-entity that:
only has US-source income;
does not have income or deductions that the partners can source or allocate and apportion; and
only has limited partners owning less than 10% of the capital and profits of the partnership at all times during the tax year.
(Though the IRS clarified that a business with no foreign-source income must still file Part II (foreign tax credit limitation) and Part III (information for preparing Forms 1116 or 1118) on Schedules K-2 and K-3 if their partners have items of international tax relevance.)
From the NATP Blog: “For preparers who are handling the returns of both the partnership and the partner, the partner can choose alternatives to filing Form 1116 and triggering the Schedules K-2 and K-3 filing requirements if one of the following applies:
The partner neither paid nor accrued any foreign taxes and there was no foreign tax credit carryover for the tax year;
The foreign tax paid was under the $300 individual reporting threshold ($600 for married filing jointly) for Form 1116, or an election is made under Section 904(j) of the Tax Code to report the credit without the form;
Schedule A is used to report a deduction for foreign taxes (which also avoids the $10,000 SALT cap).
“Preparers who are not completing returns for the partner reporting foreign tax payments will need to ask the partners/shareholders directly for their information. If they fail to respond to the request, the preparer will at least have made a documented, good-faith effort to obtain the required information and should be eligible for the good-faith relief outlined in Notice 2021-39.”
Therefore, for preparers who have to file Schedules K-2 or K-3, there are three options. – One is to extend the returns, as e-filing is not available until after the current due date of both the S corporation and partnership returns. – Another option is to paper-file the return, which will cause delays in processing. – The third option (what we will likely do for those returns we cannot reasonably extend) is to prepare the K-2/K-3 forms and attach them to e-filed S-Corp and Partnership returns as a PDF. Generally the IRS is not great about referring to these attachments, and some tax software programs have problems delivering them; but at least it will show a good-faith attempt in the case of an audit.
Per Amber Gray-Fenner in Forbes, “These alternatives, while prudent, present some potentially serious unintended consequences:
The IRS may be inundated with PDF attachments that it is not prepared to process and review. PDF attachments are often separated from original returns never to be seen again—at least not until the taxpayer receives a notice looking for the “missing” information.
Many more PTE returns may be put on extension than would normally be the case.
Extended PTE returns mean extended 1040s, which is unsatisfactory to many taxpayers and tax professionals.”
In that same article, my colleague Fred Stein hopes “Occam’s Razor ‘kicks in and IRS realizes the unintended consequences this creates for many small businesses.’ If not, the additional work involved could cause PTE return preparation prices to increase by thirty to fifty percent.”
A summary from last week’s AICPA Town Hall:
We will be reaching out to all our S-Corp and Partnership clients to let them know about these new rules, and to ask that they obtain signed confirmation from each of their owners as to any personal requirement to file Form 1116 or another foreign-related tax form on the 1040 returns.
As you may have guessed, this unexpected new guidance will cause additional time, effort, and cost to all our small business S-Corps and Partnerships — almost none of whom actually have any foreign transaction exposure. After all the requests we’ve made of the IRS to reduce the tax preparation burden on small business owners and their CPAs, I wish I could say this is laughable.
In case that wasn’t enough for you, we’ve compiled a rich list of resources for your reading and watching enjoyment.
Compass Tax Resources: • 2/10/22 Free 15-Minute Webinar – discussion on the new requirements for partnerships and S corporations with Thomas Gorczynski, EA USTCP, and Kevin J. Todd, EA, CPA Compass Tax Resources: • 2/17/22 Free 10-Minute Webinar – update on the new FAQ relief for partnerships and S corporations with Thomas Gorczynski, EA USTCP, and Kevin J. Todd, EA, CPA
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
